![]() ![]() Not only that, as the solution is provided on your own AWS account lots of advanced configurations are included without your involvement. Utopiops is a solution that gives you the simplicity that Heroku provides on AWS meaning you can now have the best of both worlds. The high quality service that AWS provides has a way lower cost for the raw material (yup I'm calling RDS raw material compared to Heroku, please forget the pre-historic datacenter era!), along with perfect integrations with the rest of your platform and advanced options to make the solution way more secure irrespective of the instance size. Simplicity of Heroku, means less operational cost and more agility in the development of the product, with a developer first experience and more focus on shipping a quality product that directly brings value and generates revenue. ![]() Overall if in the middle of the article you were completely convinced that picking AWS is a no brainer, I believe you might now factor in more real life parameters in your assessment. Obviously the DevOps engineers, permanent or on contract, in most cases are way more costly than the savings you were planning to have if that was the reason you choose AWS over Heroku and asking the developers to manage AWS means lots of distraction, sub-optimal infrastructure utilization, and in most cases less skilled developers (you're hiring someone who knows AWS and deep down you know that you're willing to sacrifice the development skills to some extent). ![]() It's very typical for the teams that run their solution on AWS to have multiple DevOps engineers for the larger teams or hire developers particularly with AWS experience to handle the operations for them while doing their coding tasks in smaller teams. product vs operations, and can even impact your hires. On top of all these differences, setting up read-replica instances, failoever and many optimisations on RDS are way more involved than the Heroku's counterparts, meaning that you have to shift the focus from building the product and providing a better service towards operational activities.Ĭhoosing AWS as your platform while might look like buying directly from the factory, comes at the cost of lots of DIYs which can heavily impact where you spend your time, i.e. As you can guess, again you have to navigate to different sides of the AWS dashboard to be able to get the metrics you want with the level of details you like, while still some metrics are available on the RDS page with limited options. Heroku provides very limited monitoring options out of the box which can be enough in many cases but as your use cases become complicated they definitely lack many metrics that can help you troubleshoot the system.ĪWS on the other hand gives you the ever growing CloudWatch metrics which can help you fine tune even the applications using that database based on the behaviour that becomes clear looking at the extensive metrics available to you. Heroku has simple options to create backups and restore the databases but again doesn't give you much control even on how long you want to retain the backups.ĪWS on the contrary gives you plenty of options or decision points from a different perspective but again it requires a good understanding of how RDS works and even knowing the fact that your RDS snapshots are stored on S3 can help you better understand the logic behind some behaviours. While this might sound appealing at first, we should consider that it comes at the price of increased complexity, meaning a lot more time to spend, and many more ways to take wrong decisions. On the other hand, AWS gives you heaps of options from deciding the VPC and subnets to setting the security groups, parameter groups and option groups. Heroku gives you way less options meaning way fewer decisions to be made, and faster progress knowing that lots of the decision Heroku takes for you are already descent decisions. This section is more of an analytical experience instead of quantitative comparison. Simplicity of use and operational overhead It's worth mentioning that all the pricing difference in AWS column is based on the extra pricing for the storage when Multi-AZ option is available, otherwise irrespective of the price and size RDS instances have all the features. *AWS 16 GB memory was the closest match to Heroku 15 GB memory
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |